The Medical Malpractice Act was not intended to cover claims by third parties having absolutely no relationship to the doctor or medical provider.
M. Robb
Anonymous Physician v. Rogers, No. 02A03-1401-CT-1, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 7, 2014).
Doctrine of continuing wrong does not apply to doctor’s continued use of disinfectant that caused plaintiff’s allergic reaction in his medical malpractice action.
Neal v. Austin, No. 49A02-1404-DR-225__ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 31, 2014).
Ind. Code § 31-16-6-6 “necessitates that where the most recent order establishing a child support obligation was issued after June 30, 2012, the child must file a petition for educational needs before the child becomes nineteen years of age.”
Richard v. State, No. 46A05-1312-CR-628, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 8, 2014).
Evidence that housing complex was at the time of trial a “family housing complex” as defined by statute was insufficient to prove the drug transaction was within 1,000 feet of a family housing complex at the time of the alleged offense.
Remy v. State, No. 48A02-1310-CR-857, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sep. 30, 2014).
Prejudicial impact outweighed probative value of pornographic materials found in defendant’s home admitted on “grooming” rationale.