Savings statute for the revised penal code did not prohibit application of the revised sentence modification statute, which does not require prosecutorial consent to a modification petition, to a petition to modify a crime committed and sentenced prior to the July 1, 2014 effective date of the modification statute’s revision.
M. Robb
Preferred Professional Ins. Co., v. West, No. 49A02-1403-CT-163, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 16, 2014).
The Medical Malpractice Act was not intended to cover claims by third parties having absolutely no relationship to the doctor or medical provider.
Anonymous Physician v. Rogers, No. 02A03-1401-CT-1, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 7, 2014).
Doctrine of continuing wrong does not apply to doctor’s continued use of disinfectant that caused plaintiff’s allergic reaction in his medical malpractice action.
Neal v. Austin, No. 49A02-1404-DR-225__ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 31, 2014).
Ind. Code § 31-16-6-6 “necessitates that where the most recent order establishing a child support obligation was issued after June 30, 2012, the child must file a petition for educational needs before the child becomes nineteen years of age.”
Richard v. State, No. 46A05-1312-CR-628, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 8, 2014).
Evidence that housing complex was at the time of trial a “family housing complex” as defined by statute was insufficient to prove the drug transaction was within 1,000 feet of a family housing complex at the time of the alleged offense.