• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

M. Robb

Compton v. State, No. 82A01-1511-CR-1997, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 24, 2016).

August 29, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Defendant was not deprived due process when the media was allowed to tweet live updates of his criminal trial from the courtroom.

Gardenour v. Bondelie, No. 32A01-1601-DR-82, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 15, 2016).

August 15, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Same-sex couple’s California registered domestic partnership established a relationship virtually identical to marriage, and under the principle of comity, their relationship is a spousal relationship. Child born by artificial insemination was a child of the spousal relationship; trial court did not err in awarding joint legal custody and parenting time and ordering partner to pay child support.

Harris v. State, No. 83A01-1509-CR-1311, __N.E.3D__ (Ind. Ct. App., July 27, 2016).

August 1, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam, M. Robb

Defendant’s name appearing on NPLEx did not provide an independent basis of reasonable suspicion that would justify further investigation after a seat belt enforcement stop.

Green v. Robertson, No. 49A02-1509-MI-1487__ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 5, 2016).

July 11, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

“Where recovery is limited to damages for increased risk of harm because the patient stood less than a 50% chance of recovery prior to encountering the physician’s negligence, the trial court may consider evidence of the patient’s underlying risk in order to determine the appropriate amount of damages.”

In re F.S., No. 13A01-1505-JM-363, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 12, 2016).

May 16, 2016 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

DCS is not required to conduct an interview with a child as part of its assessment, but the trial court may issue such an order if the parent does not consent and DCS shows good cause on the record supporting its request for an interview.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 10
  • Go to page 11
  • Go to page 12
  • Go to page 13
  • Go to page 14
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 29
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs