Defendant was not deprived due process when the media was allowed to tweet live updates of his criminal trial from the courtroom.
M. Robb
Gardenour v. Bondelie, No. 32A01-1601-DR-82, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 15, 2016).
Same-sex couple’s California registered domestic partnership established a relationship virtually identical to marriage, and under the principle of comity, their relationship is a spousal relationship. Child born by artificial insemination was a child of the spousal relationship; trial court did not err in awarding joint legal custody and parenting time and ordering partner to pay child support.
Harris v. State, No. 83A01-1509-CR-1311, __N.E.3D__ (Ind. Ct. App., July 27, 2016).
Defendant’s name appearing on NPLEx did not provide an independent basis of reasonable suspicion that would justify further investigation after a seat belt enforcement stop.
Green v. Robertson, No. 49A02-1509-MI-1487__ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 5, 2016).
“Where recovery is limited to damages for increased risk of harm because the patient stood less than a 50% chance of recovery prior to encountering the physician’s negligence, the trial court may consider evidence of the patient’s underlying risk in order to determine the appropriate amount of damages.”
In re F.S., No. 13A01-1505-JM-363, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 12, 2016).
DCS is not required to conduct an interview with a child as part of its assessment, but the trial court may issue such an order if the parent does not consent and DCS shows good cause on the record supporting its request for an interview.