Trial court infringed upon the custodial rights of parent by delegating decision-making as to child’s need for therapy to a service provider.
M. Robb
Daviess-Martin County Join Parks and Recreation Dept. v. Estate of Abel, No. 19A04-1607-CT-1563, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 19, 2017).
Using the Rogers/Goodwin analysis, looking at the “broad type of plaintiff” and “broad type of harm” the lake owner/operator had no duty to a swimmer who contracted a rare infection from the lake because a reasonable person would not recognize the duty and agree that one exists.
Jenner v. Bloomington Cellular Services, Inc., No. 53A05-1606-MI-1415, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 12, 2017).
Tax sale purchasers must provide notice to any person with a substantial, publicly recorded interest even if their interest lies outside the chain of title. “Requiring a tax-sale purchaser to search outside the chain of title—even if it means searching thousands of records in the county recorder’s office—is one of the safeguards created by the statute.”
Taylor v. State, No. 32A05-1608-CR-1720, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 17, 2017).
Evidence obtained via a valid search warrant is admissible even though the arresting officer only had an electronic copy at the time of the search.
Dermatology Assoc., P.C. v. White, No. 49A02-1512-PL-2189, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App, Jan. 19, 2016).
To trigger the 180-day statute of limitations extension for a medical malpractice action, the plaintiff must show that she has subsequently acquired knowledge of or received information about something she did not previously know with regard to her injury and $15,000 is insufficient to compensate her for that more serious injury.