• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

M. May

Cottingham v. State, No. 06A01-1008-CR-431, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 19, 2011).

July 22, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

2010 amendment of I.C. 35-38-2.6-6 providing for “credit time” for community corrections home detention is ameliorative and required credit for home detention served prior to the amendment when probation was revoked after effective date.

Foster v. State, No. 02A03-1010-CR-596, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 10, 2011)

June 17, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May, W. Garrard

Police had probable cause to believe contraband was in the residence, but a warrantless search violated the Indiana Constitution when “[t]wenty-one days had elapsed since the controlled buy, and there [wa]s no evidence that exigent circumstances called for an immediate arrest.”

Adams v. State, No. 29A02-1008-CR-903, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 31, 2011)

April 1, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Evidence that a jar of marijuana was found on car floor in front of defendant passenger’s seat established that the car was “used” to commit possession of marijuana, so that the defendant’s license could be suspended under IC 34-48-4-15.

Grange Mut. Cas. Co. v. West Bend Mut. Ins. Co, No. 29A02-1008-PL-965, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 15, 2011)

March 18, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander, M. May

In a coverage dispute regarding occurrence polices, the time of the damage, and not the time of the alleged negligent conduct that caused the damage, is the triggering event for coverage. Further, coverage under both policies were triggered under the circumstances of this case and damages are to be apportioned pursuant to the language of the insurance policies.

Saffold v. State, No. 49A05-1003-CR-180, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 17, 2010)

December 28, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Under both the 4th Amendment and the Indiana Constitution, officer safety permitted a second pat-down search of motorist stopped for traffic infraction after officer reasonably suspected motorist might be armed, had him exit the vehicle, and found ammunition on his person in the initial pat-down and more ammunition in the vehicle.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 26
  • Go to page 27
  • Go to page 28
  • Go to page 29
  • Go to page 30
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 34
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs