When, without probable cause, police officers approached defendant at gunpoint and handcuffed him, and defendant remained handcuffed and guarded by one or the other officer while two searches of his vehicle were conducted, the officers’ actions exceeded the scope of an investigatory stop and became an arrest without probable cause.
M. May
Hogan v. State, No. 71A05-1702-CR-278, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 5, 2018).
In order to place a defendant in Purposeful Incarceration, the trial court must state in the Abstract of Judgment that, after successful completion of an appropriate therapeutic program, the court will consider a petition to modify defendant’s sentence.
In re: Petition for Expungement of the Conviction Records of B.S., No. 02A05-1710-XP-2262, __ N.E.3d __(Ind. Ct. App., March 5, 2018).
Although the expungement statute does not specifically mention PCR records, the intent behind the statute is to allow the petitioner to return to his or her former state without stigma so PCR records can be expunged.
Person v. State, No. 49A02-1708-CR-1737, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 7, 2018).
Trial court could not order costs of victim’s public transportation and for her pain and suffering as part of defendant’s restitution.
Orange v. Ind. Bureau of Motor Vehicles, No. 29A02-1707-MI-1549, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 31, 2018).
Ind. Code § 9-30-16-3 does not require trial courts to hold a hearing prior to making a decision on a petition for specialized driving privileges.