Bradbury’s counsel did not render ineffective assistance by pursuing an all-or-nothing strategy.
M. Massa
State v. Katz, No. 20S-CR-632, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 18, 2022).
Ind. Code § 35-45-4-8, which criminalizes the non-consensual distribution of an intimate image, does not violate the free interchange clause of the Indiana Constitution, or the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
WTHR-TV v. Hamilton Se. Sch. Dist., No. 21S-MI-345, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 13, 2022).
Ind. Code § 5-14-3-4(b)(8) requires public agencies to provide certain types of information, but it does not require them to provide the underlying documents.
Ladra v. State, No. 21S-CT-235, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 9, 2021).
When the government knows of an existing defect in a public thoroughfare, and when it has ample opportunity to respond, immunity does not apply simply because the defect manifests during recurring inclement weather.
Miller v. Patel, No. 21S-CT-455, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 7, 2021).
Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act’s statute of limitations does not preempt an amendment under Trial Rule 15(C).