Ind. Code § 35-40-5-11.5, the child sex-offense deposition statute, is both constitutionally sound and substantive in nature, and therefore, the Indiana Trial Rules cannot abrogate or modify the statute.
M. Massa
State v. Neukam, No. 21S-CR-567, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 23, 2022).
Slaughter, J. In 2020, we held juvenile courts lose jurisdiction once an alleged delinquent child reaches twenty-one years of age. But we left open the question whether the State can file criminal charges against a person who committed the charged conduct before turning eighteen but is no longer a child under the juvenile code. Under […]
ResCare Health Svcs., Inc. v. Ind. Family & Social Svcs. Admin., No. 21S-MI-372__ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 5, 2022).
Although a complaint for declaratory judgment could not be decided by an ALJ, upon judicial review, one could be reviewed by the trial court judge without a separate complaint being filed.
Service Steel Warehouse Co. v. U.S. Steel Corp., No. 21S-CC-408, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 10, 2022).
Under the mechanic’s lien statute, a supplier can have a lien by furnishing materials, regardless of the recipient, for the erection of a building.
Bradbury v. State, No. 21S-PC-441, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 7, 2022).
Bradbury’s counsel did not render ineffective assistance by pursuing an all-or-nothing strategy.