• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

M. Barnes

Shivley v. State, No. 12A02-0903-CR-235, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 2, 2009)

September 3, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

In determining indigency for the purpose of court-appointed counsel, trial courts should consider defendant’s actual income as of the time of the hearings and his fixed monetary obligations, including his obligations to his family.

Harris v. State, No. 91A05-0904-CV-188, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App.. Sept. 2, 2009)

September 3, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

To constitute sufficient proof of notice under the bond forfeiture statute, State must at a minimum present evidence of compliance with Indiana Trial Rule 5(B), which governs service of papers in civil actions.

In re Termination of Parental Relationship of J.G., No. 32A04-0902-JV-79, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 7, 2009)

August 14, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker, M. Barnes

Notwithstanding the recent revision of the relevant statutes, the General Assembly did not intend for DCS to bear the burden of court-appointed legal services in termination proceedings, and the county should continue to be responsible for those costs.

Webster v. State, No. 71A03-0902-CR-78, __ N.E.2D __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 22, 2009)

June 26, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker, M. Barnes

Search of traffic stop passenger’s purse, on basis officer thought it looked “stretched” and might therefore contain a firearm, violated Art. 1, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution.

Washington Twp. Fire Dep't v. Beltway Surgery Ctr., No. 93A02-0811-EX-1006, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 24, 2009)

June 26, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

The employer of an injured employee bears the burden of proving that a medical service provider’s bill exceeds the Worker’s Compensation 80th percentile standard.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 21
  • Go to page 22
  • Go to page 23
  • Go to page 24
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs