• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

M. Barnes

Termination of Parent-Child Rel. of D.K., No. 22A01-1110-JT-485, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., May 30, 2012).

May 31, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

“Evidence Rule 201(b) now allows trial courts to take judicial notice of records of other court proceedings, but if a court does so, there must be some effort made to include such ‘other’ records in the record of the current proceeding.”

Martinez v. Deeter, No. 32A01-1108-DR-359, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., May 31, 2012).

May 31, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Survivor benefits paid to children due to the death of a custodial parent’s subsequent spouse are not included in the custodial parent’s weekly gross income.

Reynolds v. Capps, No. 77A05-1110-SC-567,___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., May 23, 2012).

May 25, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Defendant was denied due process when the trial court ordered her to vacate her apartment in a hearing conducted by a court reporter.

State ex rel. FSSA v. Est. of Roy, No. 33A04-1105-ES-24, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 28, 2012).

March 1, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch, M. Barnes

FSSA, a subdivision of the State, filed a valid lien against the property of a Medicaid recipient, had a preferred claim under Ind. Code 12-15-9-1, and was not required to file its claim within nine months of the death of the Medicaid recipient.

Yanez v. State, No. 49A02-1104-CR-362, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 21, 2012).

February 24, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, B. Barteau, M. Barnes

When officer who made the investigatory stop did not testify as to her reasons for making the stop and supporting officer’s testimony amounted only to “postulation” as for reasons for the initial stop, there was no showing that there was any constitutional basis for stopping the defendant.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 13
  • Go to page 14
  • Go to page 15
  • Go to page 16
  • Go to page 17
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 24
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs