• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

J. Kirsch

Preferred Professional Ins. Co., v. West, No. 49A02-1403-CT-163, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 16, 2014).

December 18, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch, M. Robb

The Medical Malpractice Act was not intended to cover claims by third parties having absolutely no relationship to the doctor or medical provider.

Anonymous Physician v. Rogers, No. 02A03-1401-CT-1, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 7, 2014).

November 13, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch, M. Robb

Doctrine of continuing wrong does not apply to doctor’s continued use of disinfectant that caused plaintiff’s allergic reaction in his medical malpractice action.

Layman v. State, No. 20A04-1310-CR-518, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 12, 2014).

September 18, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch, M. Bailey, M. May

Multiple opinion decision affirms felony murder convictions of waived juveniles when the death resulted from burglary victim’s shooting of defendants’ accomplice.

Hutchison v. Trilogy Health Services, LLC, No. 30A01-1307-SC-316, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 30, 2014).

January 30, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

When the daughter agreed “to pay the facility the full amount of the resident’s income and resources that the Responsible Party/Agent controls or accesses,” in an agreement with a nursing home for her mother, and there was no evidence presented that daughter ever had access to or control of mother’s income or resources from which to make payment to the nursing home, the daughter was not liable for the nursing home costs.

Wood v. State, No. 53A05-1208-CR-423 , __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 31, 2013).

January 2, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch, M. May

Criminal Rule 4(C)’s one year period did not include the time required for the Indiana Supreme Court to appoint a special judge following withdrawal of a case from the trial judge pursuant to Criminal Rule 15 and Trial Rule 53.1. Affirms conviction for violating IC 14-15-4-1 on duties of a boat operator after a collision, but observes the “problematic” statute “permits no consideration of what is reasonable in any given emergency situation; nor does it permit citizens to engage in any balancing of considerations that arise in typical emergencies and are likely required by other statutes.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 5
  • Go to page 6
  • Go to page 7
  • Go to page 8
  • Go to page 9
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 15
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs