Trial court did not abuse its discretion in fashioning a remedy that required the cemetery to provide plaintiff with a different gravesite rather than ordering the cemetery to have the individual buried in the gravesite she had previously purchased reinterred elsewhere so as to restore the gravesite for her use.
J. Kirsch
State v. McFarland, No. 18A-CR-2408, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 10, 2019
Trial court properly denied the State’s motion to amend the habitual offender charging information because it would prejudice defendant’s substantial rights and because it was not supported by good cause.
In re Adoption of C.A.H., No. 19A-AD-240, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 30, 2019).
Father’s consent to adoption was irrevocably implied pursuant to Ind. Code § 31-19-10-1.2(g) because father failed to appear for the final hearing.
Perkins v. Memorial Hospital of South Bend, No. 18A-CT-1340, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 11, 2019).
Employee’s mistaken belief that he was subpoenaed to testify at an unemployment hearing did not warrant an exception to the at-will employment doctrine.
Hickingbottom v. State, No. 18A-CR-627, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 8, 2019).
The State must produce the DOC manual on use of force by their officers when prosecuting an inmate for the crime of battery resulting in injury to a public safety officer.