• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

J. Kirsch

Buss v. Harris, No. 52A02-0911-CV-1088, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., May 17, 2010)

May 14, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

Where defendant was not determined to be a sexually violent predator at sentencing, the Department of Correction could not later make that determination. Thus, the trial court properly declined to require the defendant to register as a sexually violent predator for life.

Siwinski v. Town of Ogden Dunes, No. 64A03-0909-CV-429, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 16, 2010)

March 19, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

Short-term rental of single family residence was not a “commercial” activity in violation of a zoning ordinance which limited “R” zones to “single-family dwelling” without expressly prohibiting short-term rentals.

Washington v. State, No. 49A02-0907-CR-649, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 4, 2010)

March 5, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch, M. May

Warrantless search of vehicle during infraction stop to find a handgun which driver admitted he had and for which he possessed a valid permit violated the Fourth Amendment when the officer lacked an articulable basis of concern for officer safety.

Hobbs v. State, No. 19A01-0904-CR-187, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 21, 2009)

October 23, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

Warrantless search of defendant’s car, conducted in the evening after defendant’s arrest on an outstanding warrant and after an alert by a drug-sniff dog, did not violate Indiana Constitution’s Article I section 11.

In re Visitation of C.R.P., No. 29A04-0812-JV-758, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., July 20, 2009)

July 29, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

Where child’s father killed child’s mother, then voluntarily terminated his parental rights, child’s paternal grandmother did not have standing to pursue grandparent visitation.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 12
  • Go to page 13
  • Go to page 14
  • Go to page 15
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs