• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

J. Baker

Cooper v. State, No. 32A05-1005-CR-309, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 11, 2011)

January 14, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

When defendant was convicted of reckless homicide entailing use of a shotgun resulting in the death, imposition of the five year statutory sentence enhancement for use of a firearm did not violate double jeopardy protections.

The Presbytery of Ohio Valley, Inc. v. O.P.C., Inc., No. 82A02-1003-MF-339, __N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 14, 2010)

December 17, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

In church property dispute, Constitution-allowed “neutral principles” approach required trial court to examine church constitutions and similar laws for trust language which might favor ownership by the national church.

Lombardi v. Vandeusen, No. 10A01-0910-CV-491, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 22, 2010)

November 24, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Trial court erroneously concluded jurisdiction to modify support was not properly with Illinois court under UIFSA; ex parte pre-hearing conference, from which pro se obligee was excluded despite request to attend, at which evidence was discussed and documents were exchanged violated due process and results in opinion’s directing that case be assigned to a different judicial officer on remand.

Booher v. Sheeram, LLC d/b/a Hampton Inn of Elkhart, No. 20A03-1005-CT-338, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 15, 2010)

November 22, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Counsel must file a formal request for an extension of time to respond to a motion for summary judgment, even if opposing counsel has informally agreed to an extension.

State v. J.S., No. 49A02-1004-JV-567, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 16, 2010)

November 22, 2010 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Juvenile court did not err in dismissing delinquency petition after finding the juvenile defendant incompetent to stand trial.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 32
  • Go to page 33
  • Go to page 34
  • Go to page 35
  • Go to page 36
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 40
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs