• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

J. Baker

Lebo v. State, No. 46A05-1202-CR-104, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 16, 2012).

November 21, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, J. Baker

The B misdemeanor offense of failure to report child abuse or neglect is a continuing offense, and hence is not subject to the misdemeanor statute of limitations.

Clanton v. State, No. 49A02-1203-CR-198, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 15, 2012).

November 15, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, J. Baker

Police officer in full uniform working as a private security guard was acting as a law enforcement officer under the circumstances of the case; officer making a Terry frisk could remove sharp object from defendant’s pocket, but when officer realized object was a pen cap and not a weapon he could not take the plastic bag he observed in the cap out and inspect its contents, even though he testified bags in such caps were often used, in his experience, to store narcotics.

Lyons v. State, No. 76A03-1112-CR-582, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 11, 2012).

October 12, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Clinical psychologist’s testimony about general characteristics common to child abuse victims was properly admitted as Evidence Rule 702(a) expert “specialized knowledge” which was based on observations of victims and accordingly was not “scientific.”

Ervin v. State, No. 29A05-1109-CR-454, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., May 30, 2012

May 31, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Trial court properly concluded that evidence should not be suppressed as Ind. Code § 9-30-2-2 was not implicated. The statute provides that an officer may not arrest a person “for a violation of an Indiana law regulating the use and operation of a motor vehicle on an Indiana highway” unless the officer is in uniform or a marked police vehicle, but defendant was not arrested for violating a law regulating the use of a motor vehicle.

Gagan v. Yast, No. 45A05-1107-CT-377, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., April 5, 2012).

April 5, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Attorney’s alleged defamatory statements made against his former clients were protected on the grounds of qualified privilege.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 28
  • Go to page 29
  • Go to page 30
  • Go to page 31
  • Go to page 32
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 40
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs