When nunc pro tunc order reinstating OWI conviction after its “inadvertent[] dismissal” by State was entered after defendant had committed his second OWI offense, the reinstated conviction could not serve as a basis for enhancing the second to a D felony.
J. Baker
In Re 2012 Carroll County Tax Sale, No. 08A02-1303-MI-220, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 8, 2013).
Ind. Code § 13-26-14-4 prohibits foreclosure on property at a tax sale when an unpaid sewer bill is the only lien that exists on the property.
Patton v. State, No. 17A05-1210-CR-538, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 9, 2013).
Affirms probation condition prohibiting child sex offender from accessing Internet sites and programs in which children are likely to participate.
Ramsey v. Lightning Corp., No. 49A02-1209-CC-705, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 2, 2013).
“Trial Rule 23 supports the conclusion that the trial court may amend, alter, modify and even revoke or rescind a previous order certifying a class.”
In Re: Name change of Jane Doe, No. 49A02-1211-MI-894, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 13, 2013).
Administrative Rule 9 was the “best option” for a domestic violence victim who had filed a name change petition to avoid her abuser but wanted to avoid disclosure of her identity in the proceeding.