When defendant had moved for a trial within seventy days pursuant to Criminal Rule 4(B), the ninety day extension authorized by Criminal Rule 4(D) for unavailable state’s evidence ran from the end of the seventy day period, not from the earlier date when the trial court granted the extension.
J. Baker
Montgomery v. State, No. 82A05-1401-CR-34, __ n.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 23, 2014).
As statute requires a sex offender who moves to report to both the county he is leaving and the county he is moving to, defendant’s convictions for failing to register as a sex or violent offender in both counties were not barred either by statute or double jeopardy principles.
Brummett v. State, No. 49A02-1304-CR-378, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., June 2, 2014).
Prosecutorial misconduct amounted to fundamental error.
Tuggle v. State, No. No. 49A05-1308-CR-413, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 22, 2014).
Officer’s taking of gunshot wound victim’s clothes, which had been removed by hospital staff and placed in a bag, did not violate the victim’s Fourth Amendment rights.
Bailey v. Bailey, No. 25A04-1309-DR-452., __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 22, 2014).
The trial court erred in modifying custody when neither party requested a modification of custody.