• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

J. Baker

In re S.O., No. 41A01-1510-AD-1781, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 22, 2016).

June 27, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

A criminal background check that complies with Ind. Code §31-9-2-22.5 is necessary to the adoption process; its absence renders an adoption petition fatally deficient. Also, the adoption court should consolidate the paternity action before issuing its adoption decree.

Sidener v. State, No. 10A01-1507-CR-1006,___N.E.3d____ (Ind. Ct. App., May 26, 2016).

May 31, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Law enforcement’s use of a GPS tracking device to track the movements of a vehicle in which defendant was a passenger did not violate his rights under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution.

Schuck v. State, No. 73A01-1507-CR-981, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 4, 2016).

May 9, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Investigatory costs should be reimbursed because investigation was necessary even though defendant pleaded guilty.

Cowans v. State, No. __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 27, 2016). __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 27, 2016).

May 2, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

When being pulled over by the police, a driver does not have full discretion to choose to stop anywhere, but with “adequate justification” might have some discretion to choose the location of a stop. Whether the driver exercises limited discretion in choosing a place to stop should be a question of fact for the jury.

Fisher v. State, No. 20A03-1509-CR-1373, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 31, 2016).

April 4, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Restitution order was proper, despite plea agreement’s silence about restitution; agreement implicitly incorporated I.C. § 35-48-4-17, which mandates restitution in methamphetamine cleanup cases.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 16
  • Go to page 17
  • Go to page 18
  • Go to page 19
  • Go to page 20
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 40
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs