The roadside search of a passenger after a routine traffic stop was unduly invasive and marijuana discovered in her possession should not have been admitted into evidence at trial.
J. Baker
Bowman v. State, No. 49A02-1606-MI-1463, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 16, 2017).
Seizure of cash exceeded the scope of the search warrants. “The search warrant did not (and could not) authorize the seizure of any and all currency; instead, that currency must be found to be ‘derived directly or indirectly from, produced through, or realized through’ drug trafficking.”
Berkhardt v. State, No. 49A04-1702-CR-369, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug.10, 2017).
Absence of evidence of a medical use for the syringes and possession of the syringes in a non-medical setting, and that the defendant possessed marijuana, used a false name and identification card, was not sufficient evidence to convict a person for unlawful possession of a hypodermic syringe.
In re the Name Change of A.L, No. 79A02-1703-MI-473, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 10, 2017).
No statutory requirement exists requiring publication of notice of intent to change gender marker. Although there is a statutory requirement to publish notice of intent to change one’s name, the record can be sealed and publication waived under Admin. Rule 9 if there is a showing of “a significant risk of substantial harm” for a transgender person to change name.
A.A. v. Eskenazi Health/Midtown CMHC, No. 49A02-1610-MH-2286, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 20, 2017).
In a mental health commitment, if the respondent is not present at the hearing, the trial court’s determination of whether it should waive the respondent’s presence must be made at the outset of the hearing using evidence establishing that the respondent’s presence would be injurious to his mental health or well-being.