• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

J. Baker

D.Z. v. State, No. 32A05-1708-JV-1907, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 22, 2018).

February 26, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker, P. Riley

Because the school official and police officer employed by the school acted in concert in obtaining incriminating statements from the student, and both were aware of the probability of criminal charges, the student should have been advised of his Miranda rights.

J.R. v. State, No. 49A02-1704-JV-754, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 9, 2018).

February 12, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

General statute on carrying a handgun without a license (Ind. Code § 35-41-2-1(a)) does not apply to juveniles because a statute related to a juvenile’s dangerous possession of a firearm (Ind. Code § 35-47-10-1) exists.

Wilson v. State, No. 45A03-1707-PC-1466, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 30, 2018).

February 5, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Appellate counsel must review the complete record of proceedings before the trial court, including pre-trial hearing transcripts, in order to provide effective assistance of counsel.

In re Paternity of I.I.P, No. 63A01-1706-JP-1265, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 31, 2018).

February 5, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker, P. Riley

Although Legal Father had been established by paternity affidavit and Ind. Code §16-37-2-2.1 was inapplicable, Legal Father was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Mother’s petition to establish paternity when Mother and Biological Father could possibly disestablish paternity under Ind. Code § 31-14-5-3.

Shirey v. Flenar, No. 02A03-1704-MI-876, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 21, 2017).

December 29, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker, N. Vaidik, T. Crone

Doctor had a duty to preserve plaintiff’s medical records and is properly subject to a cause of action for spoliation.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 9
  • Go to page 10
  • Go to page 11
  • Go to page 12
  • Go to page 13
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 40
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs