• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

F. Sullivan

Galloway v. State, No. 33S01-1004-CR-163, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Dec. 22, 2010)

December 28, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: F. Sullivan, R. Shepard, Supreme

Reverses bench trial rejection of insanity defense because, despite “nonconflicting expert and lay opinion that defendant . . .was insane, the trial court rejected the insanity defense after concluding that the defendant could continue to be a danger to society because of an inadequate State mental health system.”

In re the Adoption of L.D., No. 49S02-1006-CV-330, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Dec. 16, 2010)

December 17, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: F. Sullivan, Supreme

Adoption notice by publication to mother complied with statute but failed to meet the due process requirement of a “diligent search reasonably calculated to determine the mother’s whereabouts.”

Runyon v. State, No. 57S04-1006-CR-317, __N.E.2d __ (Ind., Dec. 8, 2010)

December 10, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, F. Sullivan, Supreme

To revoke probation for failure to comply with a financial condition, the State has the burden to prove by a preponderance that the condition was violated and that the violation was reckless, knowing, or intentional; the probationer has the burden to present “facts related to an inability to pay and indicating sufficient bona fide efforts to pay so as to persuade the trial court that further imprisonment should not be ordered.”

State v. Hobbs, No. 19S01-1001-CR-10, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Sept. 30, 2010)

October 7, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: F. Sullivan, Supreme, T. Boehm

While defendant was being arrested in the restaurant where he worked, a dog sniff alert for drugs in his car parked in the restaurant lot justified a warrantless search of the car under the “automobile exception.”

Donovan v. Grand Victoria Casino & Resort, L.P., No. 49S02-1003-CV-00124, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Sept. 30, 2010)

October 7, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, F. Sullivan, Supreme

An Indiana casino may exclude an individual employing “card counting” techniques to improve her chance of winning.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 5
  • Go to page 6
  • Go to page 7
  • Go to page 8
  • Go to page 9
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 11
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs