Defined “improvement to real property” as used in Indiana Code 32-30-1-5 as “(1) an addition to or betterment of real property; (2) that is permanent; (3) that enhances the real property’s capital value; (4) that involves the expenditure of labor or money; (5) that is designed to make the property more useful or valuable; and (6) that is not an ordinary repair.”
F. Sullivan
Whiting v. State, No. 38S05-1206-CR-345, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., June 19, 2012).
Procedural default loss of a juror-bias claim when the defendant fails to exhaust her peremptory challenges is not amenable to fundamental-error review.
Nicholson v. State, No. 55S01-1107-CR-444, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Mar. 21, 2012).
Stalking conviction affirmed when alleged harassment included a twenty-two month hiatus, due largely to defendant’s incarceration.
Lakes v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co., No. 89S05-1109-CT-53, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., March 20, 2012).
The tortfeasor’s vehicle was underinsured because the amount actually paid to the plaintiff was less than the per-person limit of liability of the underinsurance endorsement.
Klinker v. First Merchants Bank, N.A., No. 01S04-1107-PL-438, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., March 20, 2012).
Although the plaintiff’s evidence tends to show multiple badges of fraud, it is not sufficient to warrant entry of summary judgment on the element of mens rea.