There is no statutory duty for a doctor to maintain adequate records; the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of doctor when “lack of documentation makes it impossible for the panel to decide whether the evidence supports or does not support a conclusion that the Defendant failed to comply with the appropriate standard of care in his treatment of the Plaintiff.”
E. Najam
S.B. v. Seymour Comm. Schools, No. 36A01-1710-PO-2252, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 26, 2018).
School corporations, through their officials, are permitted to act on behalf of their students to seek orders for protection against threatening individuals.
Barcroft v. State, No. 49A05-1704-CR-844, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 19, 2017).
Trial court erred in finding defendant guilty but mentally ill when it rejected the findings of three mental-health experts and relied on demeanor evidence that had no probative value on the question of her sanity.
Jackson v. State, No. 82A04-1609-CR-2074,__ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 5, 2017).
The trial court committed fundamental error when it permitted the State to amend the charge on the criminal gang enhancement so that the charge no longer stated an offense under Indiana law.
J.G. v. State, No. 43A03-1705-JV-957, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 2, 2017).
Juvenile was entitled to counsel at the dispositional modification hearing.