Daughter’s translation of her mother’s statements to investigating officer were admissible under the present sense impression hearsay exception.
E. Brown
Bingley v. Bingley, No. 02A03-0904-CV-187, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Oct. 30, 2009)
Husband’s employer-paid post-retirement health insurance premiums were not a marital asset subject to division, because they were purely supplemental, meaning that they were not obtained using marital assets, and were non-elective and not subject to divestiture, division, or transfer.
Mork v. State, No. 49A02-0901-CR-26, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 28, 2009)
Defendant was no longer entitled to Criminal Rule 4(B) trial within 70 days when court released him on his own recognizance, while he was imprisoned in Department of Corrections serving a sentence on an unrelated offense.
Walker v. Nelson, No. 49A05-0903-CV-138, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 14, 2009)
When limiting former custodial parent’s parenting time, trial court erred by not making a specific finding that visitation would endanger child’s physical health or well-being or significantly impair his emotional development.
Metro Health Professionals, Inc. v. Chrysler, LLC, No. 06A04-0809-CV-547, __ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., May 4, 2009)
Auto purchaser was entitled to “Lemon Law” relief after seller’s fourth unsuccessful repair attempt even though a fifth repair attempt apparently succeeded after the “Lemon Law” was invoked.