• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

E. Brown

Alter v. State, No. 85A04-1101-CR-44, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 31, 2011).

September 2, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

After conservation officer had been shown subject’s fishing license, further detention for questions based on officer’s hunch subject might have put marijuana in his duffle was unsupported by reasonable suspicion and required suppression of marijuana subject produced on officer’s command to “give me your marijuana.”

Aguirre v. State, No. 49A05-1101-CR-36, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 25, 2011).

August 26, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Evidence that traffic stop motorist reached her hand into her purse to answer her cellphone while officer was trying to handcuff her for safety reasons did not suffice to prove crime of resisting arrest.

Lechien v. Wren, No. 48A02-1007-DR-882, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., July 26, 2011).

July 29, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

“[R]epudiation is not a release of a parent’s financial responsibility for the payment of child support and is not an acceptable justification to abate support payments for a child less than twenty-one years of age.”

CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Barabas, No. 48A04-1004-CC-232, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 17, 2011)

May 20, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown, P. Riley

“Mortgagee” Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS) was a “mere nominee” and “bare legal title” holder without interest in the property separate from that of the original lender Irwin, and as mortgage provided for notices only to Irwin the lender, and not to MERS, MERS’s assignee Citimortgage was not entitled to have default in the foreclosure of another mortgage vacated on the basis only Irwin and not MERS received foreclosure notice.

Ryan v. Ryan, No. 71A03-1009-DR-453, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 28, 2011)

April 1, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

The dissolution court “may issue an order providing additional terms to the extent the Settlement Agreement and Private Agreement are silent,” instead of modifying the terms of the Settlement Agreement to provide relief under TR 60(B).

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 19
  • Go to page 20
  • Go to page 21
  • Go to page 22
  • Go to page 23
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 26
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs