The date of counsel’s appearance, not of counsel’s appointment, determines whether a defendant’s pro se Criminal Rule 4(B) speedy trial motion is valid.
E. Brown
Ishiii v. Young, No. 49A02-1103-PL-31, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 6, 2011).
A trial court lacks jurisdiction to review the actions of another court or to issue a writ of mandate or prohibition against another trial court.
Carraway v. State, No. 47A01-1104-CR-162, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 17, 2011).
Trial court’s failure to take guilty plea into account as a mitigating factor required remand for resentencing.
Nowling v. State, No. 31A01-1010-CR-552, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 24, 2011).
Probationer home search was invalid as unsupported by reasonable suspicion a probation violation occurred.
Buchanan v. State, No. 82A01-1103-CR-139, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 24, 2011).
Credit time for defendant’s pre-trial incarceration was properly counted as “credit restricted” despite fact defendant had not yet been determined to be a “credit restricted” felon until his conviction.