• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

C. Goff

Ladra v. State, No. 21S-CT-235, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 9, 2021).

December 13, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, M. Massa, Supreme

When the government knows of an existing defect in a public thoroughfare, and when it has ample opportunity to respond, immunity does not apply simply because the defect manifests during recurring inclement weather.

Staat v. Ind. Dept. of Transportation, No. 21S-CT-240, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 9, 2021).

December 13, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, Supreme

A government entity is “not liable” for a loss or injury resulting from the “temporary condition of a public thoroughfare . . . that results from weather.” Because the evidence designated by the government establishes that the weather-induced condition continued to worsen at the time of the accident, the Court holds that the condition was temporary and the government immune from liability.

Griffin v. Menard, Inc., No. 21S-CT-119, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 19, 2021).

October 26, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, S. David, Supreme

When a box opened at the bottom and injured store customer, plaintiffs’ designated evidence did not create an issue of material fact to defeat defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs’ res ipsa loquitur claim also failed.

Rotert v. Stiles, No. 21S-TR-452, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 8, 2021).

October 12, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, G. Slaughter, Supreme

Statutory prohibition against restraints on marriage applies only to a devise to a spouse by will and not to other dispositions, like a trust.

Bradbury v. State, No. 21S-PC-441, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 1, 2021).

October 4, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: C. Goff, M. Massa, S. David, Supreme

Trial counsel was not ineffective for stipulating that defendant’s alleged accomplice, was convicted of murder because the stipulation did not relieve the State of the burden to prove defendant’s intent. Trial counsel pursued a reasonable all-or-nothing strategy when he chose not to seek a lesser-included instruction on reckless homicide.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 9
  • Go to page 10
  • Go to page 11
  • Go to page 12
  • Go to page 13
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 18
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs