• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

C. Bradford

Risinger v. State, No. 19A-CR-281, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 9, 2019).

December 9, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Defendant’s statement, “I’m done talking,” was an unequivocal invocation of his right to remain silent pursuant to Miranda, and the detectives’ continuation of questioning thereafter was a failure to honor that right.

Strickholm v. Anonymous Nurse Practitioner, No. 19A-MI-696, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 21, 2019).

November 25, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

It is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether an appointment to check blood pressure and review of those results was considered medical care to delay the statute of limitations.

McAnalley v. State, No. 18A-CR-1099, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 18, 2019).

October 21, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, C. Darden

Defendant is permitted to stipulate to his status as a felon in a trial for unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon. When a passenger in an automobile is arrested on a warrant, search of the passenger compartment is permissible under both the Indiana and federal constitutions, based on suspicious behavior and/or admission by the passenger of ownership of contraband in the passenger side of the vehicle.

Clark v. Mattar, No. 19A-CT-380, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 4, 2019).

October 7, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Trial court abused its discretion in denying for-cause challenge to juror who indicated that he would be unable to sit on a jury asked to determine damages for non-economic loss, which plaintiff was seeking.

Pinch-N-Post, LLC v. McIntosh, No. 19A-TP-239, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 27, 2019).

September 3, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, E. Tavitas

The proper remedy for an inadequate tax sale redemption notice [Ind. Code § 6-1.1-25-4.5] is ordering a new 120-day redemption period.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to page 5
  • Go to page 6
  • Go to page 7
  • Go to page 8
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 27
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs