• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

C. Bradford

Sanjari v. State, No. 20A03-1206-CR-273, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 15, 2013).

January 17, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

When a trial court resentences multiple counts on remand, no presumption of vindictive sentencing arises if the aggregate resentence is not greater than the original aggregate sentence.

Thomas v. State, No. 64A03-1204-PL-191, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 28, 2012).

November 29, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Ten year statute of limitations applies to habitual traffic violator suspensions; three-year delay in imposition of habitual traffic offender suspension was not shown to be subject to “extreme unfairness” basis for applying laches to bar an administrative regulatory sanction.

Lebo v. State, No. 46A05-1202-CR-104, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 16, 2012).

November 21, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, J. Baker

The B misdemeanor offense of failure to report child abuse or neglect is a continuing offense, and hence is not subject to the misdemeanor statute of limitations.

Couch v. State, No. 48A04-1204-CR-181, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 14, 2012).

November 15, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

At sentencing the court heard testimony about other victims’ molestations, which were not to be charged under the plea bargain; caselaw holds conduct for which charges are avoided under a bargain cannot be used to give longer sentences, but here nothing in the record indicated the court considered the testimony as an aggravating factor.

Clanton v. State, No. 49A02-1203-CR-198, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 15, 2012).

November 15, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, J. Baker

Police officer in full uniform working as a private security guard was acting as a law enforcement officer under the circumstances of the case; officer making a Terry frisk could remove sharp object from defendant’s pocket, but when officer realized object was a pen cap and not a weapon he could not take the plastic bag he observed in the cap out and inspect its contents, even though he testified bags in such caps were often used, in his experience, to store narcotics.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 17
  • Go to page 18
  • Go to page 19
  • Go to page 20
  • Go to page 21
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 27
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs