Based on the principles of notice pleading, Plaintiff can pursue negligence claims against the hospital’s pharmacist despite not making the claim to the medical review panel.
C. Bradford
Orange v. Morris, No. 45A03-1310-PL-414, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 18, 2014).
City court judge properly filed a complaint in mandamus in Circuit Court instead of issuing a mandate order under T.R. 60.5.
Williams v. State, No. 34A02-1406-CR-418, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 9, 2014).
When auto’s tail light had a hole in it such that the white light from the hole was “overwhelming,” as long as there was some red light plainly visible at 500 feet there was no violation of the tail lamp statute and the stop predicated on a tail lamp violation was illegal.
Montgomery v. State, No. 82A01-1404-CR-163, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 11, 2014).
NPLEx system’s records of pseudoephedrine or ephedrine sales evidence were not “testimonial” and hence their admission did not violate the accused’s Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause rights.
In re C.R., No. 79A05-1404-GU-176. __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 26, 2014).
Grandparents have no right to request psychological evaluations for their grandchildren against their parents’ wishes.