When defendant is charged with committing the offense in a drug-free zone, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that children were reasonably expected to be present when the offense occurred.
C. Bradford
Gill v. Gill, 20A03-1607-DR-1569, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 22, 2017).
The statutory authority allowing a trial court to order a divorced parent to contribute to his child’s post-secondary educational expenses is constitutional.
Robertson v. Anonymous Clinic, No. 71A03-1512-CT-2199, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 7, 2016).
Alleged negligence by a medical provider in selecting a certain drug from a particular supplier are claims subject to the Medical Malpractice Act.
State v. Morgan, No. 89A04-1603-CR-622, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 16, 2016).
The Indiana Legend Drug Act, Ind. Code § 16-42-19-20, is not unconstitutionally vague and it was possible for defendant nurse, as a non-physician, to know whether her actions were outside the usual course of professional medical practice.
Weathers v. State, No. 49A04-1601-CR-3, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 17, 2016).
It is reasonable to require a law enforcement officer to follow established policies of completing a written inventory while conducting a warrantless search of a vehicle, but failure to do so will not result in suppression of items found in that search.