• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

C. Bradford

Kirby v. State, No. 34A02-1609-CR-2060, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 31, 2017).

September 5, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

The statute prohibiting individuals convicted of certain sex crimes from entering school property is unconstitutional as applied to defendant because it amounts to retroactive punishment in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause.

Stafford v. State, No. 49A05-1609-CR-2012, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 31, 2017).

September 5, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

An act of reckless driving in a work zone can only sustain one conviction even though it caused two deaths; the distinction between conduct- and result-based offenses remains the law in Indiana.

McGrath v. State, No. 49A04-1610-CR-2270, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 31, 2017).

July 31, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, J. Kirsch

Probable cause to obtain a search warrant to use thermal imaging technology must be based on evidence that corroborates a tip that criminal activity has occurred or is occurring at a place, and not solely on the training and experience of law enforcement officers.

In re Civil Commitment of M.L., No. 49A02-1612-MH-2823, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 27, 2017).

June 30, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, P. Riley

A special condition of a mental health commitment must bear a relationship to treatment or protection of the public; special condition of no alcohol or drug use was struck because there was no record of this relationship.

McAlpin v. State, No. 39A01-1606-CR-1417, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 22, 2017).

March 27, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, N. Vaidik

When defendant is charged with committing the offense in a drug-free zone, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that children were reasonably expected to be present when the offense occurred.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 8
  • Go to page 9
  • Go to page 10
  • Go to page 11
  • Go to page 12
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 28
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs