• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

B. Dickson

Griffin v. State, No. 71S03-0907-CR-333, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Feb. 23, 2010)

February 26, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

Addresses the meaning of “briefly” in the drug crime enhancement “defense” that defendant was only “briefly” within one thousand feet of a school, park, etc..

Bules v. Marshall County, No. 50S03-1001-CV-57, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Jan. 27, 2010)

January 29, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme, T. Boehm

The Indiana Tort Claims Act’s immunity for losses caused by temporary weather conditions during the period of reasonable response to a weather condition lasts at least until the weather condition has stabilized.

State v. Haldeman, No. 55S00-0906-CR-266, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Jan. 15, 2010)

January 22, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

Even though statute requiring preliminary appellate review of wiretap warrant has been repealed, Criminal Rule 25’s requirement of preliminary appellate review of wiretap warrants must be complied with.

Inlow v. Inlow, No. 29S02-0902-CV-89, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Nov. 18, 2009)

November 20, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

When settlement resolves a wrongful death action, a court should direct payment from the pre-trial wrongful death settlement that part of the medical, hospital, funeral, and burial expenses that corresponds to the ratio of the total of such expenses to the estimated total damages sustained.

Williams v. Tharp, No. 29S02-0901-CV-40, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Oct. 13, 2009)

October 16, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, R. Rucker, Supreme, T. Boehm

In a defamation action, plaintiff can overcome defendant’s claim of qualified privilege by showing that defendant made the statement without belief or grounds for belief in its truth; the proper standard for determining grounds for belief in truth is not reckless disregard; the absence of any discernable basis for the truth of the matter can, however, serve as circumstantial evidence of a reporting citizen’s actual knowledge of falsity.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 19
  • Go to page 20
  • Go to page 21
  • Go to page 22
  • Go to page 23
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 25
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs