Temple had a duty to protect its attendees when it had notice of present and specific circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to recognize the risk of an imminent criminal act, and had reason to recognize the probability or likelihood of looming harm on a special day of celebration.
Appeals
State v. Stone, No. 20A-CR-421, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 31, 2020).
An informant’s declaration against penal interest can furnish sufficient basis for establishing the informant’s credibility.
Reece v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., No. 20A-CT-214, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 20, 2020).
Defendant was not negligent when its grass grew so high that the grass blocked the view at the intersection because the “dangerous condition” was confined to defendant’s property.
King v. State, No. 20A-CR-6, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 13, 2020).
Driver’s license suspension with no controlling words such as “until” or “to” expires on 12:00 a.m. on the listed date and is no longer in effect from the beginning of that day; not 11:59 p.m.
Salhab v. State, No. 19A-CR-3059, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 10, 2020).
A probation condition that requires a defendant to refrain from visiting “businesses that sell sexual devices or aids” is unconstitutionally vague.