• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Family Dental Care, P.C. v. Mousa, No. 21A-PL-670, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 29, 2021).

January 3, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey, R. Altice

Liquidated damages and attorney fees under the Wage Payment Statute were not available to plaintiff because she did not file a wage payment claim with the Department of Labor, even though the claim exceeded the $6,000 threshold.

Guthery v. State, No. 21A-CR-711, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 22, 2021).

January 3, 2022 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

The felony suspendability statute is not a progressive penalty statute, as it does not elevate the seriousness of an offense and its corresponding penalty due to a previous conviction. Rather, it merely limits the discretion of the trial court to order a sentence to be suspended, all within the existing sentencing range for the offense. To that end, the felony suspendability statute is not a sentencing enhancement statute to which double-enhancement analysis applies.

Niccum v. State, No. 21A-CR-1533, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 20, 2021).

December 20, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

The calculation of good time credit is a function of the defendant’s accrued time.

In re Power of Attorney of DeHart, No. 21A-GM-1043, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 17, 2021).

December 20, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, R. Shepard

When a request for accounting under a power of attorney is made, the person holding the power of attorney has the burden to prove the accounting is not in the power of attorney’s best interests.

Washington v. State, No. 21A-CR-997, _ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 9, 2021).

December 13, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

The market reports exception to hearsay under Evidence Rule 803(17) does not apply to allow the admission of evidence from Drugs.com that was used to identify pills for possession charges.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 55
  • Go to page 56
  • Go to page 57
  • Go to page 58
  • Go to page 59
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 400
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs