• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Indiana Family & Social Servs. Admin. v. Meyer, No. 69A01-0807-CV-358, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 30, 2009)

January 30, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey, M. Barnes, P. Mathias

Because plaintiff did not timely file the agency record or seek an additional extension of time in which to do so, its petition for judifical review of a final agency action was “subject to dismissal” under the Administrative Orders and Procedures Act; the trial court, however, had discretion to find that a petition “subject to dismissal” should not, upon a proper showing, be dismissed.

In re Termination of Parental Rights of J.H., No. 02A05-0807-JV-410, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 12, 2009)

January 16, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Indiana Code § 31-32-9-1(d) does not exempt DCS from compliance with service of process Trial Rules, but DCS nevertheless adequately complied with such rules to satisfy due process considerations.

Allied Property & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Good, No. 85A04-0902-CV-89, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 31, 2009)

January 11, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

If a trial court finds that an attorney or party caused a mistrial by egregiously violating an order in limine, the trial court has the inherent power to sanction him or her.

Gibson v. Indiana Dep't of Correction, No. 49A04-0803-CV-165, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 29, 2008)

January 9, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

The Sex and Violent Offender Registry statute does not violate sections 12 and 23 of Article 1 of the Indiana Constitution; in addition, the registry statute consistently requires lifetime registration by some but not all violent offenders.

Sommers v. Sommers, No. 49A02-0710-CV-916, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec 29, 2008)

January 9, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

Trial court properly confirmed arbitration award where the party challenging it failed to file a motion to vacate, modify, or correct within the time prescribed by the United States Arbitration Act, which the parties agreed would govern any arbitration.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 395
  • Go to page 396
  • Go to page 397
  • Go to page 398
  • Go to page 399
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs