• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Mark Dill Plumbing Co., No. 87A01-0807-CV-307, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 25, 2009)

March 27, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, E. Friedlander, M. May

Trial court did not err in denying mortgage owner’s request for a “strict foreclosure” where mortgage owner failed to make junior lienholders parties to the foreclosure action.

Attaway v. Omega, No. 11A01-0712-CV-608, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 13, 2009)

March 20, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown, T. Crone

Trial court properly denied motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, because defendants-eBay sellers purposefully availed themselves of the privilege of conducting activities within Indiana.

In re N.E., No. 49A02-0806-JV-522, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 19, 2009)

March 20, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik, P. Riley

Where DCS alleged Child to be a CHINS with respect to Mother, but not with respect to Father, Court of Appeals remanded the case for determination of whether Father is willing and able to appropriately parent Child.

Shotts v. State, No. 71A03-0808-CR-400, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 12, 2009)

March 13, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

“Good faith” exception did not save arrest on Alabama arrest warrant which was based on a completely conclusory affidavit; fact arresting Indiana officers never had seen the warrant or affidavit did not alter the result.

Barkwill v. Cornelia H. Barkwill Revocable Trust, No. 64A04-0808-CV-455, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 12, 2009)

March 13, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

“[A]n automatic presumption that any adult child who assists an aging parent is presumed to be in a dominant role and exert undue influence over that parent’s decisions is ill-advised.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 394
  • Go to page 395
  • Go to page 396
  • Go to page 397
  • Go to page 398
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 403
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs