• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Beldon v. State, No. 43A05-0805-CR-302, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 21, 2009)

May 22, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Fact that physician had a busy schedule, without a showing that she could not have rearranged the schedule or that she was subpoenaed, did not make her “unavailable” such that her videotaped deposition could be admitted without violating the Confrontation Clause.

Whatley v. State, No. 49A02-0809-CR-808, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 21, 2009)

May 22, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Sullivan

Fact church was used for some secular activities, such as Girl Scouts, did not change it into a “youth program facility” “drug free zone” supporting enhancement of cocaine sentence.

Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Patrick, No. 49A02-0807-CV-614, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., May 18, 2009)

May 22, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Trial court properly characterized father’s claim for damages for emotional distress arising from the negligence of the medical personnel treating his adult son as independent of and in addition to the adult wrongful death claim.

Travelers Indemn. Co. v. Jarrells, No. 29A02-0807-CV-669, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., May 21, 2009)

May 22, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden, N. Vaidik, P. Riley

Travelers Indem. Co. v. Jarrells (Ind. Ct. App., Darden, J.) – Although (or because) trial court instructed the jury that, in determining its verdict, it must consider evidence of worker’s compensation payments, employer’s insurance carrier is entitled to reimbursement from the judgment for the worker’s compensation it paid on the injured employee’s behalf.

Metro Health Professionals, Inc. v. Chrysler, LLC, No. 06A04-0809-CV-547, __ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., May 4, 2009)

May 8, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Auto purchaser was entitled to “Lemon Law” relief after seller’s fourth unsuccessful repair attempt even though a fifth repair attempt apparently succeeded after the “Lemon Law” was invoked.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 391
  • Go to page 392
  • Go to page 393
  • Go to page 394
  • Go to page 395
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 403
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs