• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Harris v. State, No. 91A05-0904-CV-188, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App.. Sept. 2, 2009)

September 3, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

To constitute sufficient proof of notice under the bond forfeiture statute, State must at a minimum present evidence of compliance with Indiana Trial Rule 5(B), which governs service of papers in civil actions.

Barber v. State, No. 49A02-0901-CR-34, __ N.E.2d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 17, 2009)

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

When there was no evidence defense discovery of exculpatory witnesses the weekend before trial was in bad faith, and prejudice to State from a continuance was minimal, trial court reversibly erred in denying a continuance and applying instead a hard deadline for the witness list to exclude the witnesses.

Lang v. State, No. 67A01-0905-CR-241, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 17, 2009)

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Under notice-based approach, entry of final judgment, from which time period to file notice of appeal began to run, was not when sentence was announced in court or when posted to the RJO but rather when the judge signed the sentencing order.

Collins v. State, No. 35A02-0902-CR-162 , __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 21, 2009)

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Probation modification statute permitted addition of special probation conditions without proof of a violation, and as statute is remedial it applied to probation imposed before its adoption.

Walker v. Nelson, No. 49A05-0903-CV-138, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 14, 2009)

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown, T. Crone

When limiting former custodial parent’s parenting time, trial court erred by not making a specific finding that visitation would endanger child’s physical health or well-being or significantly impair his emotional development.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 385
  • Go to page 386
  • Go to page 387
  • Go to page 388
  • Go to page 389
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 405
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs