• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Collins v. State, No. 35A02-0902-CR-162 , __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 21, 2009)

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Probation modification statute permitted addition of special probation conditions without proof of a violation, and as statute is remedial it applied to probation imposed before its adoption.

Walker v. Nelson, No. 49A05-0903-CV-138, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 14, 2009)

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown, T. Crone

When limiting former custodial parent’s parenting time, trial court erred by not making a specific finding that visitation would endanger child’s physical health or well-being or significantly impair his emotional development.

In re Paternity of J.J., No. 08A02-0903-JV-280, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 25, 2009

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Trial court abused its discretion when it modified custody because of Mother’s relocation without considering all of the factors required by Indiana Code section 31-17-2.2-1(b).

Kimbrough v. State, No. 20A03-0901-CR-29, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 13, 2009)

August 14, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Determinations of defendant’s ability to pay fines, court costs, and public defender fund reimbursement were not required at sentencing when the payments were deferred until post-sentence events. When victim had obtained a civil judgment against defendant prior to sentencing, trial court might have to adjust restitution order to avoid double recovery for victim.

Elrod v. Brooks, No. 10A01-0903-CV-155, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., July 29, 2009)

August 14, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Small claims court abused its discretion when it denied plaintiff the opportunity to present evidence refuting defendant’s counterclaim after defendant presented his evidence.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 385
  • Go to page 386
  • Go to page 387
  • Go to page 388
  • Go to page 389
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 404
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs