• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Barber v. State, No. 49A02-0901-CR-34, __ N.E.2d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 17, 2009)

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

When there was no evidence defense discovery of exculpatory witnesses the weekend before trial was in bad faith, and prejudice to State from a continuance was minimal, trial court reversibly erred in denying a continuance and applying instead a hard deadline for the witness list to exclude the witnesses.

Lang v. State, No. 67A01-0905-CR-241, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 17, 2009)

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Under notice-based approach, entry of final judgment, from which time period to file notice of appeal began to run, was not when sentence was announced in court or when posted to the RJO but rather when the judge signed the sentencing order.

Collins v. State, No. 35A02-0902-CR-162 , __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 21, 2009)

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Probation modification statute permitted addition of special probation conditions without proof of a violation, and as statute is remedial it applied to probation imposed before its adoption.

Walker v. Nelson, No. 49A05-0903-CV-138, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 14, 2009)

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown, T. Crone

When limiting former custodial parent’s parenting time, trial court erred by not making a specific finding that visitation would endanger child’s physical health or well-being or significantly impair his emotional development.

In re Paternity of J.J., No. 08A02-0903-JV-280, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 25, 2009

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Trial court abused its discretion when it modified custody because of Mother’s relocation without considering all of the factors required by Indiana Code section 31-17-2.2-1(b).

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 380
  • Go to page 381
  • Go to page 382
  • Go to page 383
  • Go to page 384
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 400
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs