• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Garcia-Torres v. State, No. 64A03-0812-CR-630, __ N.E.2d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 30, 2009)

October 23, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, T. Crone

DNA cheek swab may be taken without a warrant based on reasonable suspicion; Pirtle counsel right for a valid consent to search by a person in custody does not apply to consenting to taking of a cheek swab.

Damron v. State, No. 49F18-8909-PC-109913, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 19, 2009)

October 23, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Record is not “silent” for purposes of Boykin rights waiver advisement because guilty plea hearing recording was destroyed; here, P-C.R. petitioner presented no evidence he was not advised of Boykin rights, so “presumption of regularity” that advice was given applied.

Hobbs v. State, No. 19A01-0904-CR-187, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 21, 2009)

October 23, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

Warrantless search of defendant’s car, conducted in the evening after defendant’s arrest on an outstanding warrant and after an alert by a drug-sniff dog, did not violate Indiana Constitution’s Article I section 11.

D.B. v. M.B.V., No. 32A01-0903-CV-110, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2009)

October 16, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

To terminate parenting time, trial court must articulate a finding that parenting time would endanger the child’s physical health or significantly impair the child’s emotional development.

Hillebrand v. Supervised Estate of Charlotte Fern Large, No. 70A01-0902-CV-72, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Oct. 13, 2009)

October 16, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

The damages awarded in a wrongful death action may include the reasonable attorney fees necessary to pursue the action, and these damages inure to the exclusive benefit of the estate for the payment of such costs.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 377
  • Go to page 378
  • Go to page 379
  • Go to page 380
  • Go to page 381
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 400
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs