• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Reinhart v. State, No. 57A03-1002-CR-84, __N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 9, 2010)

July 9, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

When motorist calmly complied with officer’s commands, although motorist had yelled at officer earlier, officer’s pointing firearm at and handcuffing of motorist transformed a permissible investigative stop into an illegal arrest without probable cause.

Halferty v. State, No. 20A03-0910-CR-475, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 9, 2010)

July 9, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

Testimony that cooking ephedrine/pseudoephedrine would “usually” and “generally” reduce it to methamphetamine at a 70 percent ratio but that ratio could have been as low as 50 percent was insufficient to prove defendant was manufacturing more than three grams of methamphetamine so as to support an A felony conviction.

Taylor v. State, No. 71A04-1001-PC-6, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 9, 2010)

July 9, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Officers’ warrantless search of home to determine whether there was an additional occupant who could have fired a weapon was a valid protective sweep.

Fowler v. State, No. 49A02-0910-CR-1037, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 30, 2010)

July 2, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

A police booking printout was “administrative,” not investigative, and hence was admissible under the public record hearsay exception; the booking printout also was not “testimonial” under the Crawford confrontation rule.

T.N. v. B.D., No. 49A02-0907-JV-693, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 29, 2010)

July 2, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Trial court’s order prohibiting Mother from discussing with the media the knowledge she obtained independent of juvenile proceedings was an invalid prior restraint on Mother’s free speech rights.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 358
  • Go to page 359
  • Go to page 360
  • Go to page 361
  • Go to page 362
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 400
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs