• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Adcock v. State, No. 47A01-0912-CR-591, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 27, 2010)

September 3, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Prosecutor’s analogy to jig saw missing two pieces to demonstrate the difference between beyond all reasonable doubt and beyond a reasonable doubt did not require reversal.

Fisher v. State, No. 10A01-1001-CR-21, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 30, 2010)

September 3, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated when he diligently attempted to be tried on Indiana charges while in federal custody for five years but State did not seek to have him tried under a policy not to return persons in another jurisdiction’s custody until their sentences were served in that jurisdiction.

Regalado v. Eastate of Regalado, No. 64A05-0911-CV-672, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 27, 2010)

September 3, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Indiana Code section 29-1-2-7(b), which governs paternal inheritance to, through, and from a child born out of wedlock, requires a child to show she is a child born out of wedlock; because there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the child in this case was a child born out of wedlock, trial court erred in granting summary judgment in the child’s favor.

Walker v. State, No. 71A03-1003-CR-115, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 17, 2010)

August 20, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

“Continuing crime doctrine” did not apply to distinct crimes.

In re Paternity of P.B., No. 03A01-1001-JP-5, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 16, 2010)

August 20, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Trial court erred in imposing a clear-and-convincing-evidence standard with respect to Mother’s motion to modify and terminate Father’s parenting time.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 356
  • Go to page 357
  • Go to page 358
  • Go to page 359
  • Go to page 360
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 404
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs