• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Wilkins v. State, No. 02A03-0910-CR-451, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 27, 2010)

July 30, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey, M. Barnes

When factors which would justify a “no-knock” residential search were not “exigent,” but rather were known when the search warrant was applied for but not presented to the judge to have judicial authority for a “no-knock” entry, and the policy of the law enforcement agency was to routinely leave the “no-knock” decision to the police team rather than obtaining approval from an independent authority, suppression of the fruits of the “no-knock” search was appropriate under the Indiana Constitution.

Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Brough, No. 88A01-0911-CV-550, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., July 26, 2010)

July 30, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Sharpnack

Trial court erred in vacating its order for arbitration, because the arbitration clause in the parties’ contract was not terminated by one party’s bankruptcy discharge.

Spangler v. Bechtel, No. 49A05-0908-CV-482, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., July 27, 2010)

July 30, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Mother who suffered a stillbirth due to medical malpractice qualified as an injured patient and satisfied the actual victim requirement under the Medical Malpractice Act regardless of whether the malpractice resulted in injuries to the mother, the fetus, or both, and Parents may assert a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress under the modified impact rule.

Adoption of H.W., No. 71A03-0911-CV-516, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., July 28, 2010)

July 30, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Trial court had the ability to consider simultaneously both the CHINS action and the Foster Parents’ petition to adopt Child; trial court erred, however, when it determined that DCS’s withholding of consent to the adoption was not in Child’s best interest.

Williams v. State, No. 18A02-0911-CR-1092, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 16, 2010)

July 23, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

When two controlled substance possession counts alleged possession of different commercial drugs, Vicodin and Anexsia, when each drug contained the same controlled substance, dihydrocodeinon, there could be only one conviction of possession of a controlled substance.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 355
  • Go to page 356
  • Go to page 357
  • Go to page 358
  • Go to page 359
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 400
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs