• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Delao v. State, No. 20A05-1003-CR-182, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 10, 2011)

January 14, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

After judge had instructed parties a request would be necessary to have sidebars recorded due to limitations of recording equipment, defense counsel’s failure to request a recorded sidebar conference meant that the record failed to show the particular grounds for his objection to evidence.

Christie v. State, No. 33A01-1006-CR-306, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 10, 2011)

January 14, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

At State’s request in a community corrections revocation based on defendant’s commission of a new crime, trial judge properly took judicial notice under Ev. Rule 201(b) of records of town court showing defendant’s new conviction in that court.

Cooper v. State, No. 32A05-1005-CR-309, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 11, 2011)

January 14, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

When defendant was convicted of reckless homicide entailing use of a shotgun resulting in the death, imposition of the five year statutory sentence enhancement for use of a firearm did not violate double jeopardy protections.

State v. Laker, No. 24A04-0912-CR-736, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 29, 2010)

January 7, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Operating a farm tractor while intoxicated is an operating while intoxicated offense, but operating a farm tractor while driving privileges are suspended is not an offense.

Jewell v. State, No. 32A04-1003-CR-187, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 30, 2010)

January 7, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Defendant’s federal and state constitutional rights to counsel were not violated when police had minor, for whom defendant was charged with assisting to get a tattoo, call the defendant and elicit statements police recorded about defendant’s prior criminal sexual conduct with the minor.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 334
  • Go to page 335
  • Go to page 336
  • Go to page 337
  • Go to page 338
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 400
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs