• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Edmond v. State, No. 49A04-1012-CR-756, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 14, 2011).

July 15, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Odor of burned marijuana on traffic stop driver’s breath conferred probable cause to arrest.

Hundley v. State, No. 24A01-1010-CR-550, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 14, 2011).

July 15, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Entire weight of “pill dough” produced in intermediate step in methamphetamine manufacture was properly considered as methamphetamine in excess of 3 grams required for A felony manufacturing.

J.L. v. Ind. Dept. of Child Svcs., No. 32A01-1010-JC-532, ___N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., July 6, 2011).

July 15, 2011 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

A judge can cite statutes and facts not in CHINS petition.

Butler V. State, No. 84A01-1008-CR-414, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 27, 2011)

July 1, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Greer v. State’s holding, that a probationer who proceeds pro se and admits the petition need not be advised of the “pitfalls of self-representation,” applies despite decision in Hopper v. State requiring guilty plea advice of dangers of proceeding pro se and “that an attorney is usually more experienced in plea negotiations and better able to identify and evaluate any potential defenses and evidentiary or procedural problems in the prosecution’s case.”

Cartwright v. State, No. 82A01-1005-CR-214, __ N.E.2D __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 22, 2011)

June 24, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch, N. Vaidik

Finds the State’s four race-neutral reasons for peremptory challenge to only African-American venireperson to have been pretextual because the trial judge made no finding which of the four reasons it relied on to reject the Batson challenge and because the State failed to “develop anything beyond the most superficial of records regarding its reasons.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 327
  • Go to page 328
  • Go to page 329
  • Go to page 330
  • Go to page 331
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 404
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs