The trial court properly refused to approve a settlement agreement entered into by parents regarding custody of minor children.
Appeals
Patton v. State, No. 17A05-1210-CR-538, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 9, 2013).
Affirms probation condition prohibiting child sex offender from accessing Internet sites and programs in which children are likely to participate.
In re Infant T., No. 67A05-1301-JP-36, __ N.E.2d __, (Ind. Ct. App., July 11, 2013).
A petition to disestablish maternity is not cognizable, but maternity can be indirectly disestablished by a putative mother petitioning the court for the establishment of maternity and proving her maternity by clear and convincing evidence.
Gates v. City of Indianapolis, No. 49A04-1210-OV-503, __ N.E.2d __, (Ind. Ct. App., July 11, 2013).
Defendant is entitled to a jury trial on alleged violations of municipal ordinances.
Ramsey v. Lightning Corp., No. 49A02-1209-CC-705, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 2, 2013).
“Trial Rule 23 supports the conclusion that the trial court may amend, alter, modify and even revoke or rescind a previous order certifying a class.”