Evidence that housing complex was at the time of trial a “family housing complex” as defined by statute was insufficient to prove the drug transaction was within 1,000 feet of a family housing complex at the time of the alleged offense.
Appeals
Griffith v. State, No. 48A02-1310-CR-909, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sep. 30, 2014).
Trial court properly excluded testimony from two witnesses about prior inconsistent statements made by a witness who had testified earlier.
Remy v. State, No. 48A02-1310-CR-857, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sep. 30, 2014).
Prejudicial impact outweighed probative value of pornographic materials found in defendant’s home admitted on “grooming” rationale.
Robinson v. State, No. 49A05-1405-CR-224, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 1, 2014).
Trial court is to determine whether defendant should receive educational credit time earned while serving a sentence of home detention.
Campbell v. State, No. 89A04-1312-CR-634, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 2, 2014).
When defendant violated terms of plea agreement by refusing to testify against co-defendants, the State was properly permitted to withdraw from the agreement despite its having been accepted by the trial court.