• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Ind. Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Watson, No. 45A03-1607-MI-1538, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App, Jan. 23, 2016).

January 23, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Although labeled otherwise, plaintiff’s Motion to Issue a Valid Driver’s License Credential effectively asked the trial court to engage in judicial review of an agency action and plaintiff was required to comply with the Indiana Administrative Orders and Procedures Act.

Skipworth v. State, No. 49A02-1605-CR-973, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 10, 2017).

January 17, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Trial court has authority to order defendant to complete domestic violence counseling even though he was not convicted of domestic battery when it is reasonably related to the crime.

Tyms-Bey v. State, No. 49A05-1603-CR-439, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 13, 2017).

January 17, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam, J. Baker

Indiana’s RFRA offers no protection for the allegedly criminal nonpayment of income taxes, and the trial court did not err by denying a request to assert the defense.

Watkins v. State, No. 82A01-1510-CR-1624, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 6, 2017).

January 9, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown, M. May

Under the totality of the circumstances, the extent of law enforcement’s need for a “military-style assault” was low and the degree of intrusion was unreasonably high; the search violated defendant’s right to be secure against an unreasonable search and seizure.

Neal v. State, No. 20A04-1606-CR-1326, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 29, 2016).

January 3, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

The court substantially complied with the requirement of I.C. 35-38-1-7.8(c) by making it clear to the defendant that her status as a credit-restricted felon would impact her ability to earn credit time toward her sentence.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 172
  • Go to page 173
  • Go to page 174
  • Go to page 175
  • Go to page 176
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 400
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs