• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Angel Shores Mobile Home Park, Inc. v. Crays, No. 79A02-1605-CT-1106, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 20, 2017).

June 26, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Child Wrongful Death Statute allows the recovery of attorney’s fees and expenses.

Totton v. Bukofchan No. 24A01-1612-CT-2849, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 14, 2017).

June 19, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

If a non-physician healthcare provider, such as a chiropractor, is not qualified under Evidence Rule 702 to render an opinion as to medical causation because the causation issue is complex, then chiropractors sitting on medical review panels are likewise not qualified to render opinions as to medical causation when the causation issue is complex.

Daviess-Martin County Join Parks and Recreation Dept. v. Estate of Abel, No. 19A04-1607-CT-1563, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 19, 2017).

June 19, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes, M. Robb

Using the Rogers/Goodwin analysis, looking at the “broad type of plaintiff” and “broad type of harm” the lake owner/operator had no duty to a swimmer who contracted a rare infection from the lake because a reasonable person would not recognize the duty and agree that one exists.

Jones v. State, No. 49A02-1611-CR-2513, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 12, 2017).

June 12, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey, N. Vaidik

When defendant is convicted after a trial to the court, the right to waive allocution is personal to the defendant and may not be waived by counsel.

Jenner v. Bloomington Cellular Services, Inc., No. 53A05-1606-MI-1415, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 12, 2017).

June 12, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey, M. Robb, N. Vaidik

Tax sale purchasers must provide notice to any person with a substantial, publicly recorded interest even if their interest lies outside the chain of title. “Requiring a tax-sale purchaser to search outside the chain of title—even if it means searching thousands of records in the county recorder’s office—is one of the safeguards created by the statute.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 161
  • Go to page 162
  • Go to page 163
  • Go to page 164
  • Go to page 165
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 400
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs