• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Hetty, Inc. v. Weems, No. 24A-SC-148, __N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 14, 2024).

June 17, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

In a small claims matter, defendant was not required to formally plead a nonparty defense.

Tyree v. State, No. 23A-CR-2153, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 14, 2024).

June 17, 2024 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Ind. Code 35-38-4-2(a)(5), which permits the State to appeal “from an order granting a motion to suppress evidence, if the ultimate effect of the order is to preclude further prosecution of one (1) or more counts of an information or indictment,” focuses on the effect of the trial court’s ruling: whether the ruling on the defendant’s motion prevents the State from presenting evidence necessary to prove its case.

In re Adoption of M.J.H., No. 23A-AD-2769, __N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 10, 2024).

June 10, 2024 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Ind. Code chapter 31-19-5, governing the putative father registry, applies where a mother does not consent to an adoption. The relevance of a mother’s execution of consent to an adoption is merely the timing for her to provide information about a putative father.

Brackenridge v. State, No. 23A-CR-2496, __N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 29, 2024).

June 3, 2024 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

To be classified as a serious violent felon, a defendant must have been convicted of a statutory listed felony. If a defendant’s qualifying felony conviction is reduced to a misdemeanor by virtue of the AMS statute, a defendant would no longer qualify as a serious violent felon.

Salmon v. Tafelski, No. 23A-CT-2173, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 17, 2024).

May 20, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Where a remedy is available and adequate under the probate code, the heir of a decedent who died intestate does not have the authority to maintain an independent claim for tortious interference with an inheritance outside the probate estate.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 14
  • Go to page 15
  • Go to page 16
  • Go to page 17
  • Go to page 18
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 404
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs